Identifying incoming students who are at risk of struggling academically is critical for higher education institutions to provide timely and effective support. This process enables higher education institutions to provide targeted support and resources to students who need it the most, which in turn increases the chances of their success.
Over multiple years, 20% of each incoming class were identified as needing high-support. The average second-year retention of this population was less than 60% for one institution.
Beyond lower retention rates, individuals identified as requiring high support demonstrated a lower first-semester grade average, falling by at least one letter grade when compared to other groups.
Those identified as needing higher support have a higher likelihood of encountering challenges in credit completion, resulting in extended graduation timelines or elevated rates of attrition.
Proactively identifying and assisting students at risk of academic struggles mid-semester is crucial for higher education institutions. By leveraging early alerts, mid-term grades, and comprehensive student engagement data, institutions can swiftly pinpoint challenges and provide targeted support.
Early warning signals, coupled with mid-term grades, offer a nuanced understanding of academic progress, enabling timely interventions. A holistic evaluation of student engagement across campus activities provides insights into overall well-being. Over multiple years, one institution saw the average second-year retention of those identified as needing high-support throughout the semester was close to 50%.
Higher education institutions often face the challenge of students struggling and dropping out in certain courses. This can lead to lower retention rates and a less skilled workforce. By identifying courses or combinations of courses that are difficult for students, institutions can provide support and resources to help them succeed. This can be particularly important for institutions that create incoming student schedules.
Examining historical course GPA trends provides valuable insights into identifying courses where students have faced challenges and where students have seen any recent shifts in success.
Ranking courses and student schedules based on historical student progress has revealed a correlation between higher schedule difficulties and lower semester GPAs.
The combination of student risk levels and schedule difficulty rankings exhibits a robust correlation with academic outcomes, encompassing semester GPA and second-year retention rates.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.